Geoffrey Charles Barker
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Geoffrey Charles Barker, a licensed Representative with CE reference ADF374. Currently licensed at 1 firm(s): OP Investment Management Limited. Active regulated activities: Type 9 - Asset management. This person has 19.4 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 13.
Information
- LinkedIn:
- Email:
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OP Investment Management Limited 東英投資管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2025-07-03 | present |
| Privium Fund Management (HK) Limited | Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2025-03-03 | 2025-03-31 |
| Segantii Capital Management Limited | Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2023-09-14 | 2024-06-07 |
| Deltroit (Hong Kong) Limited | RO | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2021-02-26 | 2023-06-13 |
| Deltroit (Hong Kong) Limited | RO | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2020-11-13 | 2023-06-13 |
| Deltroit (Hong Kong) Limited | RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2019-08-16 | 2023-06-13 |
| City Financial Investment Company (Hong Kong) Limited | RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2013-12-03 | 2019-08-16 |
| Ballingal Investment Advisors Limited | RO | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2006-07-19 | 2013-09-30 |
| Ballingal Investment Advisors Limited | RO | Type 5 - Advising on futures contracts | 2006-07-19 | 2013-09-30 |
| Ballingal Investment Advisors Limited | RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2006-07-19 | 2013-09-30 |
| Ballingal Investment Advisors Limited | Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2005-11-11 | 2006-07-19 |
| Ballingal Investment Advisors Limited | Rep | Type 5 - Advising on futures contracts | 2005-11-11 | 2006-07-19 |
| Ballingal Investment Advisors Limited | Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2005-11-11 | 2006-07-19 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Geoffrey Charles Barker during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one. See the detailed formula.