Kam Lun Choy
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Kam Lun Choy (蔡錦倫), a licensed Representative with CE reference AFP991. Currently licensed at 1 firm(s): BOCI-Prudential Asset Management Limited. Active regulated activities: Type 1 - Dealing in securities; Type 4 - Advising on securities; Type 5 - Advising on futures contracts; Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance; Type 9 - Asset management. This person has 23.1 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 10.
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOCI-Prudential Asset Management Limited 中銀國際英國保誠資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2007-10-05 | present |
| BOCI-Prudential Asset Management Limited 中銀國際英國保誠資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 5 - Advising on futures contracts | 2007-08-08 | present |
| BOCI-Prudential Asset Management Limited 中銀國際英國保誠資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2007-08-08 | present |
| BOCI-Prudential Asset Management Limited 中銀國際英國保誠資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2007-07-23 | present |
| BOCI-Prudential Asset Management Limited 中銀國際英國保誠資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2007-07-23 | present |
| UOB Asia (Hong Kong) Limited 新加坡大華亞洲(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2006-03-29 | 2007-05-18 |
| UOB Asia (Hong Kong) Limited 新加坡大華亞洲(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2005-12-09 | 2007-05-18 |
| UOB Asia (Hong Kong) Limited 新加坡大華亞洲(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2005-12-09 | 2007-05-18 |
| Masterlink Securities (Hong Kong) Corporation Limited 元富證券(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2003-06-05 | 2005-11-25 |
| Masterlink Securities (Hong Kong) Corporation Limited 元富證券(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2003-06-05 | 2005-11-25 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Kam Lun Choy during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one.