Phyllis Lai Ping Kan
簡麗萍
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Phyllis Lai Ping Kan (簡麗萍), a licensed former licensee with CE reference AFT395. This person has 5.0 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 13.
Information
- LinkedIn:
- Email:
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regal Portfolio Management Limited 富豪資產管理有公司 |
RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2007-03-06 | 2008-04-01 |
| Asia Investment Management Limited 亞洲資產管理有限公司 |
RO | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2005-01-17 | 2007-03-06 |
| Asia Investment Research Limited 亞洲投資研究有限公司 |
RO | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2005-01-17 | 2007-03-06 |
| Asia Investment Management Limited 亞洲資產管理有限公司 |
RO | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2005-01-17 | 2007-03-06 |
| Asia Investment Research Limited 亞洲投資研究有限公司 |
RO | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2005-01-17 | 2005-03-15 |
| Asia Investment Management Limited 亞洲資產管理有限公司 |
RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2005-01-17 | 2007-03-06 |
| Asia Investment Research Limited 亞洲投資研究有限公司 |
RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2005-01-17 | 2007-03-06 |
| Asia Investment Management Limited 亞洲資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | Pre-2003 | 2005-01-17 |
| Piper Jaffray Asia Limited 派杰亞洲有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | Pre-2003 | 2003-11-12 |
| Asia Investment Management Limited 亞洲資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | Pre-2003 | 2005-01-17 |
| Piper Jaffray Asia Limited 派杰亞洲有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | Pre-2003 | 2003-11-12 |
| Asia Investment Management Limited 亞洲資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | Pre-2003 | 2005-01-17 |
| Piper Jaffray Asia Limited 派杰亞洲有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | Pre-2003 | 2003-11-12 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Phyllis Lai Ping Kan during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one. See the detailed formula.