Chong Wey Yang
楊宗煒
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Chong Wey Yang (楊宗煒), a licensed former licensee with CE reference ALG140. This person has 8.3 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 15.
Information
- LinkedIn:
- Email:
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eastspring Investments (Hong Kong) Limited 瀚亞投資(香港)有限公司(以(瀚亞投資)名義經營業務) |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2014-06-06 | 2016-11-02 |
| Eastspring Investments (Hong Kong) Limited 瀚亞投資(香港)有限公司(以(瀚亞投資)名義經營業務) |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2014-06-06 | 2016-11-02 |
| Eastspring Investments (Hong Kong) Limited 瀚亞投資(香港)有限公司(以(瀚亞投資)名義經營業務) |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2014-06-06 | 2016-11-02 |
| NNIP Hong Kong Limited | RO | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2012-10-22 | 2013-11-27 |
| NNIP Hong Kong Limited | RO | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2012-10-22 | 2013-11-27 |
| NNIP Hong Kong Limited | RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2012-10-22 | 2013-11-27 |
| NNIP Hong Kong Limited | Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2012-05-10 | 2012-10-22 |
| NNIP Hong Kong Limited | Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2012-05-10 | 2012-10-22 |
| NNIP Hong Kong Limited | Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2012-05-10 | 2012-10-22 |
| NNIP Hong Kong Limited | RO | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2005-06-01 | 2009-01-31 |
| NNIP Hong Kong Limited | RO | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2005-06-01 | 2009-01-31 |
| NNIP Hong Kong Limited | RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2005-01-25 | 2009-01-31 |
| NNIP Hong Kong Limited | Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2004-09-20 | 2005-06-01 |
| NNIP Hong Kong Limited | Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2004-09-20 | 2005-06-01 |
| NNIP Hong Kong Limited | Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2004-09-20 | 2005-01-25 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Chong Wey Yang during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one. See the detailed formula.