Ho Man Fanny Ng
吳皓敏
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Ho Man Fanny Ng (吳皓敏), a licensed former licensee with CE reference AKU292. This person has 10.5 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 13.
Information
- LinkedIn:
- Email:
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine Corporate Finance Limited 鼎柏融資有限公司 |
RO | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2018-12-21 | 2021-01-19 |
| Alpine Securities Limited 高山證券有限公司 |
RO | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2018-07-31 | 2021-01-18 |
| Alpine Securities Limited 高山證券有限公司 |
RO | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2018-07-31 | 2021-01-18 |
| KGI Capital Asia Limited 凱基金融亞洲有限公司 |
RO | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2014-10-15 | 2015-04-22 |
| KGI Capital Asia Limited 凱基金融亞洲有限公司 |
RO | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2014-10-15 | 2015-04-22 |
| KGI Capital Asia Limited 凱基金融亞洲有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2014-06-18 | 2014-10-15 |
| KGI Capital Asia Limited 凱基金融亞洲有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2014-06-18 | 2014-10-15 |
| CCB International Capital Limited 建銀國際金融有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2010-04-30 | 2012-06-29 |
| CCB International Capital Limited 建銀國際金融有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2010-04-30 | 2012-06-29 |
| Standard Chartered Securities (Hong Kong) Limited 渣打證券(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2007-05-21 | 2009-11-01 |
| Standard Chartered Securities (Hong Kong) Limited 渣打證券(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2007-05-21 | 2009-11-01 |
| Morgan Stanley Asia Limited 摩根士丹利亞洲有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2004-06-11 | 2006-12-20 |
| Morgan Stanley Asia Limited 摩根士丹利亞洲有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2004-06-11 | 2006-12-20 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Ho Man Fanny Ng during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one. See the detailed formula.