Ka Ho Poon
潘家豪
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Ka Ho Poon (潘家豪), a licensed former licensee with CE reference AWT305. This person has 10.8 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 12.
Information
- LinkedIn:
- Email:
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fubon Fund Management (Hong Kong) Limited 富邦基金管理(香港)有限公司 |
RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2018-10-08 | 2024-04-05 |
| RHB Asset Management Limited 興業金融資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2015-07-27 | 2017-10-22 |
| RHB Asset Management Limited 興業金融資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2015-07-27 | 2017-10-22 |
| RHB Asset Management Limited 興業金融資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2015-07-27 | 2017-10-22 |
| Haitong International Asset Management (HK) Limited 海通國際資產管理(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2011-03-03 | 2014-03-21 |
| Haitong International Asset Management Limited 海通國際資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2011-03-03 | 2014-03-21 |
| Haitong International Investment Managers Limited 海通國際投資經理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2011-03-03 | 2014-03-21 |
| Haitong International Asset Management (HK) Limited 海通國際資產管理(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 5 - Advising on futures contracts | 2011-03-03 | 2014-03-21 |
| Haitong International Asset Management Limited 海通國際資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 5 - Advising on futures contracts | 2011-03-03 | 2014-03-21 |
| Haitong International Asset Management (HK) Limited 海通國際資產管理(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2011-03-03 | 2014-03-21 |
| Haitong International Asset Management Limited 海通國際資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2011-03-03 | 2014-03-21 |
| Haitong International Investment Managers Limited 海通國際投資經理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2011-03-03 | 2014-03-21 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Ka Ho Poon during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one. See the detailed formula.