Chia Wen Teoh
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Chia Wen Teoh (張嘉文), a licensed Representative with CE reference AMR406. Currently licensed at 1 firm(s): PIMCO Asia Limited. Active regulated activities: Type 1 - Dealing in securities; Type 4 - Advising on securities; Type 9 - Asset management. This person has 18.0 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 12.
Information
- LinkedIn:
- Email:
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMCO Asia Limited 品浩投資管理(亞洲)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2022-08-01 | present |
| PIMCO Asia Limited 品浩投資管理(亞洲)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2022-08-01 | present |
| PIMCO Asia Limited 品浩投資管理(亞洲)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2022-08-01 | present |
| Macquarie Funds Management Hong Kong Limited 麥格理基金管理(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2020-06-05 | 2022-03-25 |
| Macquarie Funds Management Hong Kong Limited 麥格理基金管理(香港)有限公司 |
RO | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2020-06-05 | 2022-03-25 |
| Macquarie Capital Limited 麥格理資本股份有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2017-10-06 | 2020-09-09 |
| Macquarie Capital Limited 麥格理資本股份有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2017-10-06 | 2020-09-09 |
| Macquarie Capital Limited 麥格理資本股份有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2015-10-28 | 2017-01-11 |
| UBS Securities Hong Kong Limited | Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2012-06-07 | 2015-07-21 |
| Macquarie Capital Limited 麥格理資本股份有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2005-11-04 | 2010-12-18 |
| Macquarie Capital Limited 麥格理資本股份有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2005-11-04 | 2010-12-18 |
| Macquarie Corporate (Hong Kong) Limited | Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2005-11-04 | 2010-12-18 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Chia Wen Teoh during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one. See the detailed formula.