Roderick Hou Man Ng
伍浩民
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Roderick Hou Man Ng (伍浩民), a licensed former licensee with CE reference ACZ999. This person has 3.6 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 11.
Information
- LinkedIn:
- N/A
- Email:
- N/A
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cinda International Securities Limited 信達國際證券有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2013-03-20 | 2013-06-29 |
| Phoenix Capital Management Limited |
RO | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2010-03-02 | 2012-05-31 |
| Phoenix Capital Management Limited |
RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2010-03-02 | 2012-05-31 |
| CITIC Capital Active Partner Management (HK) Limited 中信資本伙伴投資基金管理(香港)有限公司 |
RO | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2004-06-10 | 2005-02-17 |
| CITIC Capital Active Partner Management (HK) Limited 中信資本伙伴投資基金管理(香港)有限公司 |
RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2004-06-10 | 2005-03-02 |
| CITIC Capital Active Partner Management (HK) Limited 中信資本伙伴投資基金管理(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2004-05-24 | 2004-06-10 |
| CITIC Capital Active Partner Management (HK) Limited 中信資本伙伴投資基金管理(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2004-05-24 | 2004-06-10 |
| Vision Capital Investment Management Limited 遠信資本投資管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2004-01-26 | 2005-03-02 |
| Vision Capital Investment Management Limited 遠信資本投資管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2004-01-26 | 2004-07-30 |
| Vision Capital Investment Management Limited 遠信資本投資管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 5 - Advising on futures contracts | 2004-01-26 | 2004-07-30 |
| Vision Capital Investment Management Limited 遠信資本投資管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2004-01-26 | 2005-03-02 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Roderick Hou Man Ng during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one. See the detailed formula.