Po Wun Ip
葉保垣
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Po Wun Ip (葉保垣), a licensed former licensee with CE reference BEC783. This person has 11.1 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 13.
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avanta Investment Management Limited 安永達投資管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2023-01-06 | 2026-08-31 |
| Avanta Investment Management Limited 安永達投資管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2023-01-06 | 2026-08-31 |
| Optima Capital Limited 創越融資有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2021-11-17 | 2022-12-31 |
| Optima Capital Limited 創越融資有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2021-11-17 | 2022-12-31 |
| Optima Capital Limited 創越融資有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2021-11-17 | 2022-12-31 |
| Shenwan Hongyuan Capital (H.K.) Limited 申萬宏源融資(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2021-04-20 | 2021-04-21 |
| Shenwan Hongyuan Capital (H.K.) Limited 申萬宏源融資(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2021-04-20 | 2021-04-21 |
| Shenwan Hongyuan Capital (H.K.) Limited 申萬宏源融資(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2021-04-20 | 2021-04-21 |
| China Everbright Capital Limited 中國光大融資有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2017-10-30 | 2021-02-20 |
| China Everbright Capital Limited 中國光大融資有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2017-10-30 | 2021-02-20 |
| China Everbright Capital Limited 中國光大融資有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2017-10-30 | 2021-02-20 |
| Haitong International Capital Limited 海通國際資本有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2016-07-19 | 2017-10-10 |
| Quam Capital Limited 華富建業企業融資有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2014-09-15 | 2016-06-26 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Po Wun Ip during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one.