Chen Ge
葛琛
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Chen Ge (葛琛), a licensed Representative with CE reference BSQ335. Currently licensed at 1 firm(s): Vered Asset Management Limited. Active regulated activities: Type 4 - Advising on securities; Type 9 - Asset management. This person has 3.7 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 11.
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vered Asset Management Limited 薔薇資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2024-09-25 | present |
| Vered Asset Management Limited 薔薇資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2024-09-25 | present |
| China Vered Securities Limited 中薇證券有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2023-12-27 | 2024-02-27 |
| China Vered Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited 中薇資產管理(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2023-12-27 | 2024-02-27 |
| China Vered Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited 中薇資產管理(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2023-12-27 | 2024-02-27 |
| China Everbright Securities (HK) Limited 中國光大證券(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2022-07-18 | 2023-11-22 |
| China Everbright Securities Asset Management Limited 中國光大證券資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2022-07-18 | 2023-11-22 |
| China Everbright Securities (HK) Limited 中國光大證券(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2022-07-18 | 2023-11-22 |
| China Everbright Securities Asset Management Limited 中國光大證券資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2022-07-18 | 2023-11-22 |
| China Everbright Securities (HK) Limited 中國光大證券(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2022-07-18 | 2023-11-22 |
| China Everbright Securities Asset Management Limited 中國光大證券資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2022-07-18 | 2023-11-22 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Chen Ge during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one.