Cecilia Sau Man Fong
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Cecilia Sau Man Fong (方秀雯), a licensed Responsible Officer with CE reference AIZ452. Currently licensed at 1 firm(s): Metro Ascent Capital Limited. Active regulated activities: Type 1 - Dealing in securities; Type 4 - Advising on securities; Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance; Type 9 - Asset management. This person has 20.8 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 11.
Information
- LinkedIn:
- N/A
- Email:
- N/A
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metro Ascent Capital Limited 百得資本有限公司 |
RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2025-11-05 | present |
| Metro Ascent Capital Limited 百得資本有限公司 |
RO | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2017-07-28 | present |
| Metro Ascent Capital Limited 百得資本有限公司 |
RO | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2017-07-28 | present |
| Metro Ascent Capital Limited 百得資本有限公司 |
RO | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2017-07-28 | present |
| Shang International Finance Limited 尚融國際金融有限公司 |
RO | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2008-12-11 | 2016-12-28 |
| Shang International Finance Limited 尚融國際金融有限公司 |
RO | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2008-12-11 | 2016-12-28 |
| Shang International Finance Limited 尚融國際金融有限公司 |
RO | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2008-12-11 | 2016-12-28 |
| Shang International Finance Limited 尚融國際金融有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2006-05-15 | 2008-12-11 |
| Shang International Finance Limited 尚融國際金融有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2006-05-15 | 2008-12-11 |
| Shang International Finance Limited 尚融國際金融有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2006-05-15 | 2008-12-11 |
| Macquarie Corporate (Hong Kong) Limited | Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2003-06-20 | 2004-10-06 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Cecilia Sau Man Fong during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one. See the detailed formula.