Ka Ho Chan
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Ka Ho Chan (陳嘉豪), a licensed Representative with CE reference BOP869. Currently licensed at 2 firm(s): China Galaxy International Asset Management (Hong Kong) Co., Limited, China Galaxy International Securities (Hong Kong) Co., Limited. Active regulated activities: Type 1 - Dealing in securities; Type 4 - Advising on securities; Type 9 - Asset management. This person has 5.8 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 9.
Information
- LinkedIn:
- Email:
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| China Galaxy International Asset Management (Hong Kong) Co., Limited 中國銀河國際資産管理(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2024-03-06 | present |
| China Galaxy International Asset Management (Hong Kong) Co., Limited 中國銀河國際資産管理(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2024-03-06 | present |
| China Galaxy International Securities (Hong Kong) Co., Limited 中國銀河國際證券(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2023-06-19 | present |
| China Everbright Securities (HK) Limited 中國光大證券(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2019-08-01 | 2022-05-10 |
| China Everbright Securities Asset Management Limited 中國光大證券資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2019-08-01 | 2022-05-10 |
| China Everbright Securities (HK) Limited 中國光大證券(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2019-08-01 | 2022-05-10 |
| China Everbright Securities Asset Management Limited 中國光大證券資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2019-08-01 | 2022-05-10 |
| China Everbright Securities (HK) Limited 中國光大證券(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2019-08-01 | 2022-05-10 |
| China Everbright Securities Asset Management Limited 中國光大證券資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2019-08-01 | 2022-05-10 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Ka Ho Chan during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one. See the detailed formula.