Chao Zeng
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Chao Zeng (曾超), a licensed Responsible Officer with CE reference BUJ270. Currently licensed at 2 firm(s): MaiCapital Limited, Fortune (HK) Securities Limited. Active regulated activities: Type 1 - Dealing in securities; Type 4 - Advising on securities; Type 9 - Asset management. This person has 2.3 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 12.
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaiCapital Limited | RO | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2026-07-28 | present |
| MaiCapital Limited | RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2026-07-28 | present |
| Fortune (HK) Securities Limited 富強證券有限公司 |
RO | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2026-02-10 | present |
| Fortune Asset Management Limited 富強資產管理有限公司 |
RO | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2026-02-10 | 2026-07-28 |
| Fortune Asset Management Limited 富強資產管理有限公司 |
RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2026-02-10 | 2026-07-28 |
| Fortune (HK) Securities Limited 富強證券有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2025-12-12 | 2026-02-10 |
| Fortune Asset Management Limited 富強資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2025-12-12 | 2026-02-10 |
| Fortune Asset Management Limited 富強資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2025-12-12 | 2026-02-10 |
| Bitfire Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited 新火資產管理（香港）有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2024-10-14 | 2025-09-14 |
| Bitfire Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited 新火資產管理（香港）有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2024-10-14 | 2025-09-14 |
| Bitfire Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited 新火資產管理（香港）有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2024-10-14 | 2025-09-14 |
| China Securities (International) Brokerage Company Limited 中信建投(國際)証券有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2023-12-11 | 2024-07-10 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Chao Zeng during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one.