Vigyan Rao
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Vigyan Rao, a licensed former licensee with CE reference AMH160. This person has 7.3 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 12.
Information
- LinkedIn:
- Email:
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jupiter Asset Management (Asia Pacific) Limited 木星資產管理（亞太）有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2015-09-25 | 2016-02-05 |
| Nomura International (Hong Kong) Limited 野村國際(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2012-10-08 | 2013-01-24 |
| Nomura International (Hong Kong) Limited 野村國際(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 2 - Dealing in futures contracts | 2012-10-08 | 2013-01-24 |
| Deutsche Securities Asia Limited 德意志證券亞洲有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2010-07-05 | 2012-07-05 |
| Deutsche Securities Asia Limited 德意志證券亞洲有限公司 |
Rep | Type 2 - Dealing in futures contracts | 2010-07-05 | 2012-07-05 |
| Sculptor Capital Management Hong Kong Limited 司韜資本管理(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2008-09-16 | 2010-04-23 |
| Mirae Asset Global Investments (Hong Kong) Limited 未來資產環球投資(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2007-09-10 | 2008-08-23 |
| Mirae Asset Global Investments (Hong Kong) Limited 未來資產環球投資(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2007-09-10 | 2008-08-23 |
| FIL Investment Advisors | Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2005-07-22 | 2007-08-08 |
| FIL Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited 富達基金(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2005-07-22 | 2007-08-08 |
| FIL Investment Advisors | Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2005-07-22 | 2007-08-08 |
| FIL Investment Management (Hong Kong) Limited 富達基金(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2005-07-22 | 2007-08-08 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Vigyan Rao during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one. See the detailed formula.