Ka Fai Chio
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Ka Fai Chio (趙家輝), a licensed Representative with CE reference BKJ536. Currently licensed at 2 firm(s): Haitong International Securities Company Limited, Haitong International Capital Limited. Active regulated activities: Type 1 - Dealing in securities; Type 4 - Advising on securities; Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance. This person has 8.7 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 11.
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haitong International Securities Company Limited 海通國際證券有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2026-07-17 | present |
| Haitong International Securities Company Limited 海通國際證券有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2026-07-17 | present |
| Haitong International Capital Limited 海通國際資本有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2026-07-17 | present |
| Fosun International Capital Limited 復星國際資本有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2024-12-19 | 2026-05-31 |
| Fosun International Capital Limited 復星國際資本有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2024-12-19 | 2026-05-31 |
| Fosun International Capital Limited 復星國際資本有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2024-12-19 | 2026-05-31 |
| Fortune (HK) Securities Limited 富強證券有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2021-11-10 | 2024-11-13 |
| Fortune Financial Capital Limited 富強金融資本有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2021-10-19 | 2024-11-13 |
| Ample Capital Limited 豐盛融資有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2019-04-15 | 2021-09-30 |
| Apastron Capital Limited | Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2017-09-04 | 2019-01-13 |
| Apastron Capital Limited | Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2017-09-04 | 2019-01-13 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Ka Fai Chio during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one.