Joseph Kar Hing Hsu
許家興
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Joseph Kar Hing Hsu (許家興), a licensed former licensee with CE reference AKP772. This person has 11.0 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 12.
Information
- LinkedIn:
- Email:
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macquarie Capital Limited 麥格理資本股份有限公司 |
RO | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2011-01-04 | 2017-06-05 |
| Macquarie Capital Limited 麥格理資本股份有限公司 |
RO | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2011-01-04 | 2017-06-05 |
| Macquarie Corporate (Hong Kong) Limited | RO | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2011-01-04 | 2017-03-31 |
| Macquarie Capital Limited 麥格理資本股份有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2010-10-11 | 2011-01-04 |
| Macquarie Capital Limited 麥格理資本股份有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2010-10-11 | 2011-01-04 |
| Macquarie Corporate (Hong Kong) Limited | Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2010-10-11 | 2011-01-04 |
| Standard Chartered Securities (Hong Kong) Limited 渣打證券(香港)有限公司 |
RO | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2007-02-05 | 2010-09-10 |
| Standard Chartered Securities (Hong Kong) Limited 渣打證券(香港)有限公司 |
RO | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2007-02-05 | 2010-09-10 |
| Standard Chartered Securities (Hong Kong) Limited 渣打證券(香港)有限公司 |
RO | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2007-02-05 | 2010-09-10 |
| Standard Chartered Securities (Hong Kong) Limited 渣打證券(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 1 - Dealing in securities | 2006-05-08 | 2007-02-05 |
| Standard Chartered Securities (Hong Kong) Limited 渣打證券(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2006-05-08 | 2007-02-05 |
| Standard Chartered Securities (Hong Kong) Limited 渣打證券(香港)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2006-05-08 | 2007-02-05 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Joseph Kar Hing Hsu during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one. See the detailed formula.