Tak Ming Chung
鍾德明
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Tak Ming Chung (鍾德明), a licensed former licensee with CE reference ADR331. This person has 12.2 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 13.
Information
- LinkedIn:
- Email:
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamtex Securities Limited 林達證券有限公司 |
RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2016-09-02 | 2018-09-13 |
| Fosun International Securities Limited 復星國際證券有限公司 |
RO | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2008-06-23 | 2015-07-17 |
| Fosun International Securities Limited 復星國際證券有限公司 |
RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2008-06-23 | 2015-07-17 |
| Huajin Corporate Finance (International) Limited 華金融資(國際)有限公司 |
RO | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2006-06-14 | 2007-05-31 |
| ICBC Asset Management (Global) Company Limited 工銀資管(全球)有限公司 |
RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2006-06-14 | 2007-05-31 |
| Kingsway Financial Services Group Limited 滙富金融服務有限公司 |
RO | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | 2004-06-01 | 2005-05-24 |
| Kingsway Financial Services Group Limited 滙富金融服務有限公司 |
RO | Type 9 - Asset management | 2004-06-01 | 2005-05-24 |
| Kingsway Capital Limited 滙富融資有限公司 |
RO | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | Pre-2003 | 2005-05-24 |
| Kingsway SW Asset Management Limited 滙富資產管理有限公司 |
RO | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | Pre-2003 | 2005-05-24 |
| Sinochem Kingsway Asset Management Limited | RO | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | Pre-2003 | 2005-05-24 |
| Kingsway SW Asset Management Limited 滙富資產管理有限公司 |
RO | Type 9 - Asset management | Pre-2003 | 2005-05-24 |
| Sinochem Kingsway Asset Management Limited | RO | Type 9 - Asset management | Pre-2003 | 2005-05-24 |
| Kingsway Capital Limited 滙富融資有限公司 |
RO | Type 9 - Asset management | Pre-2003 | 2004-05-31 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Tak Ming Chung during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one. See the detailed formula.