Ada Man Wai Lee
李敏慧
This page summarises the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) public register record for Ada Man Wai Lee (李敏慧), a licensed Representative with CE reference AGK783. Currently licensed at 1 firm(s): Hope Chain Asset Management Co., Limited. Active regulated activities: Type 4 - Advising on securities; Type 9 - Asset management. This person has 1.8 years of SFC licence history. Total licence records on file: 12.
Licence history
| Firm | Role | Regulated activity | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hope Chain Asset Management Co., Limited 合縱資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2026-09-17 | present |
| Hope Chain Asset Management Co., Limited 合縱資產管理有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2026-09-17 | present |
| Baring Asset Management (Asia) Limited 霸菱資產管理(亞洲)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | 2004-11-23 | 2006-04-30 |
| Baring Asset Management (Asia) Limited 霸菱資產管理(亞洲)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 5 - Advising on futures contracts | 2004-11-23 | 2006-04-30 |
| Baring Asset Management (Asia) Limited 霸菱資產管理(亞洲)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | 2004-11-23 | 2006-04-30 |
| Baring Asset Management (Asia) Limited 霸菱資產管理(亞洲)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | Pre-2003 | 2003-07-06 |
| Biz Corp Limited | Rep | Type 4 - Advising on securities | Pre-2003 | 2003-07-06 |
| Baring Asset Management (Asia) Limited 霸菱資產管理(亞洲)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 5 - Advising on futures contracts | Pre-2003 | 2003-07-06 |
| Baring Asset Management (Asia) Limited 霸菱資產管理(亞洲)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | Pre-2003 | 2003-07-06 |
| Biz Corp Limited | Rep | Type 6 - Advising on corporate finance | Pre-2003 | 2003-07-06 |
| Baring Asset Management (Asia) Limited 霸菱資產管理(亞洲)有限公司 |
Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | Pre-2003 | 2003-07-06 |
| Biz Corp Limited | Rep | Type 9 - Asset management | Pre-2003 | 2003-07-06 |
Worked alongside
The 20 closest colleagues, strongest tie first — individuals licensed at the same firm as Ada Man Wai Lee during overlapping periods. Ranked by how long they overlapped and how similar their regulated activities were, with shared time at a smaller firm weighted more than at a large one.